Legal Opinion
Dorn v. Goetz
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 11, 1948No. Civ. 13722PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBray, J.
Plaintiffs brought suit for declaratory relief, and particularly for a judgment to the effect that, by governmental regulations, they were frustrated and prevented from complying with the terms of a contract to convey to defendants certain real property, and therefore entitled, as a matter of law, to rescind such contract. The trial court rendered judgment in favor of defendants. Plaintiffs appeal.
Having purchased land upon which they proposed to construct a new home, plaintiffs decided to sell their old home, and on February 15, 1946, entered into a contract to sell it and the land upon…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Lloyd v. MurphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Johnson v. AtkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- United States Trading Corp. v. Newmark Grain Co.California Court of Appeal · 1922
- F. P. Cutting Co. v. PetersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Aristocrat Highway Displays, Inc. v. StricklenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Glenn R. Sewell Sheet Metal, Inc. v. LoverdeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- McCulloch v. LiguoriCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Glens Falls Indemnity Co. v. PerscalloCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Gold v. Salem Lutheran Home Assn.California Supreme Court · 1959
- Cutter Laboratories, Inc. v. TwiningCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.