Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. Ceazan Tires, Ltd.

California Supreme Court

Decided October 31, 1944No. L. A. 18690PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTraynor, J.

On March 21, 1940, plaintiffs leased to defendant corporation, a wholesale dealer in automobile tires and tubes, then in possession under an earlier lease since 1937, for a three-year term to begin July 25, 1940, certain premises located at 1147 American Avenue in the city of Long Beach, used by defendant as one of several wholesale outlets for its business. The lease provided among other things that “The Lessee shall have full control and occupancy of the buildings upon said premises and may sublet or sublease. any part or portion thereof to any acceptable and responsible person, but the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Lloyd v. MurphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Autry v. Republic Productions, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Tractebel Energy Marketing, Inc. v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2003
  3. Oosten v. Hay Haulers Dairy Employees & Helpers UnionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  4. BP Chemicals, Inc. v. AEP Texas Central Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2006
  5. Glens Falls Indemnity Co. v. PerscalloCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API