Legal Opinion

Kessler v. Sapp

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 23, 1959No. Civ. 23529PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShinn, P. J.

Plaintiffs agreed in writing to purchase from defendants a parcel of unimproved property for subdivision purposes. Upon the latters’ refusal to convey the property, plaintiffs brought an action for specific performance. Defendants filed a cross-complaint for declaratory relief and to quiet title. At the trial, defendants objected to the introduction of any evidence upon the ground that the complaint did not state a cause of action for specific performance; their objection was sustained by the court and plaintiffs were allowed to file an amended complaint in which they sought damages for…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Carney v. SimmondsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Gould v. CallanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  3. Byson v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  4. Turman v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Burgess v. RodomCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Laks v. Coast Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  2. Magna Development Co. v. ReedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  3. Spaziani v. MillarCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  4. Jones v. Sacramento Sav. & Loan Assn.California Court of Appeal · 1967
  5. Burrow v. TimmsenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API