Legal Opinion

Binder v. Whitetail

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 29, 2013No. 20120452PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1] Nelson Whitetail, Sr., appeals from an order finding he is a sexually dangerous individual and civilly committing him to the care, custody and control of the Department of Human Services. We affirm, concluding the district court did not err in finding the State established by clear and convincing evidence that Whitetail is a sexually dangerous individual.

I

[¶ 2] In 1988 Whitetail was convicted of two counts of gross sexual imposition. The victims were his girlfriend’s two female children who were ages 3 and 5 at the time of the offenses. Whitetail was sentenced…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Van Grinsven v. G.R.H.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Feland v. P.F.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Grosinger v. M.B.K.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Enget v. J.T.N.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Cass County State's Attorney v. R.A.S.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2009

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Wamstad v. MangelsenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Interest of T.A.G.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  3. Interest of G.L.D.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  4. Grosinger v. J.G.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Interest of WhitetailNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API