Legal Opinion

McCuskey v. Canyon County Commissioners

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided February 20, 1996No. 21602PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TROUT, Justice.

This is an inverse condemnation case in which Frank MeCuskey (McCuskey) and Fred Bell (Bell) claim a temporary taking by Canyon County as a result of the County’s refusal, through rescission of a building permit and issuance of a stop-work order, to allow McCuskey and Bell to construct a convenience store on their property. The County contends that MeCuskey and Bell’s action is time barred by I.C. § 5-224. We agree and affirm the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of Canyon County.

I

BACKGROUND

McCuskey acquired a parcel of land located in Canyon County in…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  3. First English Evangelical Lutheran Church v. County of Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. G&M Farms v. Funk Irrigation Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Farm Credit Bank of Spokane v. StevensonIdaho Supreme Court · 1994

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Highlands Development Corp. v. City of BoiseIdaho Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Guzman v. Piercy / Canyon County / SuttonIdaho Supreme Court · 2014
  3. C & G, Inc. v. Canyon Highway District No. 4Idaho Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Wadsworth v. Department of Transp.Idaho Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Covington v. Jefferson CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 2002

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API