Legal Opinion

C & G, Inc. v. Canyon Highway District No. 4

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided July 29, 2003No. 28128PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KIDWELL, Justice.

C & G, Inc. (C & G) sued the Canyon Highway District No. 4 (Highway District) for inverse condemnation after the Highway District built a road through C & G’s property without compensating C & G. The Highway District defended on the ground C & G failed to file its case within the statute of limitations period. However, the district court found the statute of limitations was not triggered until the Highway District completed the construction project, which brought C & G’s suit within the four-year limitation period. The Highway district failed to prove its other affirmative…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. United States v. DickinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Bolger v. LanceIdaho Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Tibbs v. City of SandpointIdaho Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Reis v. CoxIdaho Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Farber v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1981

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Prince George's County v. LongtinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011
  2. Ada County Highway District v. Total Success Investment, LLCIdaho Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Hayden Lake Fire Protection District v. AlcornIdaho Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Atwood v. SmithIdaho Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Harris v. STATE EX REL. KEMPTHORNEIdaho Supreme Court · 2009

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API