Legal Opinion

Wadsworth v. Department of Transp.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided March 20, 1996No. 21518PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHROEDER, Justice.

This is an appeal from a district court decision granting summary judgment to the respondent, the Department of Transportation of the State of Idaho, and denying relief to the appellant, Jay 0. Wadsworth. Wads-worth pled a claim for inverse condemnation, asserting a taking of his property without the commencement of condemnation proceedings. The district court held that Wads-worth’s cause of action is barred by section 5-224 of the Idaho Code, which provides that an action must be commenced within four (4) years after the cause of action accrues. Wadsworth appeals the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. United States v. DickinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Doe v. DurtschiIdaho Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Highline School District No. 401 v. Port of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Farm Credit Bank of Spokane v. StevensonIdaho Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Ackerman v. Port of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1960

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Alan J. Cornblatt, PA v. BarowSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1998
  2. Guzman v. Piercy / Canyon County / SuttonIdaho Supreme Court · 2014
  3. C & G, Inc. v. Canyon Highway District No. 4Idaho Supreme Court · 2003
  4. City of Tupelo, Mississippi v. John Patterson (Pat) O'CallaghanMississippi Supreme Court · 2017
  5. Lankford v. City of LaramieWyoming Supreme Court · 2004

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API