Wadsworth v. Department of Transp.
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
SCHROEDER, Justice.
This is an appeal from a district court decision granting summary judgment to the respondent, the Department of Transportation of the State of Idaho, and denying relief to the appellant, Jay 0. Wadsworth. Wads-worth pled a claim for inverse condemnation, asserting a taking of his property without the commencement of condemnation proceedings. The district court held that Wads-worth’s cause of action is barred by section 5-224 of the Idaho Code, which provides that an action must be commenced within four (4) years after the cause of action accrues. Wadsworth appeals the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- United States v. DickinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Doe v. DurtschiIdaho Supreme Court · 1986
- Highline School District No. 401 v. Port of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1976
- Farm Credit Bank of Spokane v. StevensonIdaho Supreme Court · 1994
- Ackerman v. Port of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1960
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Alan J. Cornblatt, PA v. BarowSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1998
- Guzman v. Piercy / Canyon County / SuttonIdaho Supreme Court · 2014
- C & G, Inc. v. Canyon Highway District No. 4Idaho Supreme Court · 2003
- City of Tupelo, Mississippi v. John Patterson (Pat) O'CallaghanMississippi Supreme Court · 2017
- Lankford v. City of LaramieWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.