Legal Opinion

Guzman v. Piercy / Canyon County / Sutton

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided February 7, 2014No. 39708PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*932SCHROEDER, J. pro tem.

I

Nature of the Case

Dale Piercy appeals the district court’s dismissal of his amended action for declaratory relief, which challenged the validity of a herd district ordinance enacted in 1982 by the Canyon County Commissioners. The district court dismissed Piercy’s claim on the basis that it was barred by a seven-year statute of limitations or, in the alternative, a four-year statute of limitations. Piercy challenges the application of both statutes and maintains that Respondents Jennifer Sutton, Luis Guzman, and Canyon County waived any statute of limitations defense.

II

Fa…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. United States v. DickinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Bach v. BagleyIdaho Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Verska v. Saint Alphonsus Regional Medical CenterIdaho Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Bradbury v. Idaho Judicial CouncilIdaho Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Aberdeen-Springfield Canal Co. v. PeiperIdaho Supreme Court · 1999

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. City of Idaho Falls, an Idaho Mun. Corp. v. H-K Contractors, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Krinitt v. Idaho Department of Fish & GameIdaho Supreme Court · 2017
  3. State v. Le VequeIdaho Supreme Court · 2018
  4. Jim & Maryann Plane Family Trust v. SkinnerIdaho Supreme Court · 2015
  5. State v. Daniel William LearyIdaho Supreme Court · 2016

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API