Legal Opinion

Santa Monica Ice & Cold Storage Co. v. Rossier

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 17, 1941No. Civ. 11553PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNourse, P. J.

For a number of years the plaintiff had been engaged in the sale of ice in the City of Santa Monica through distributors who. were paid a salary and commission. The defendants, Rossier, Matheson and Matheson, as copartners, were selling ice out of Culver City under the trade name of Pure Ice Company. The defendants, Jacobs, Sr., Jacobs, Jr., and Tanner, were employees of plaintiff. In March, 1938, the three last named defendants left plaintiff’s employment and engaged to work for the partnership in competition with plaintiff. The Santa Monica district had been divided by plaintiff into two…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Empire Steam Laundry v. LozierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Guggenhime & Co. v. LamantiaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Pasadena Ice Co. v. ReederCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Rolapp v. Federal Building & Loan Assn.California Court of Appeal · 1936
  5. Gloria Ice Cream & Milk Co. v. CowanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Mosk v. National Research Co. of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  2. George v. BurdusisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Mathews Paint Co. v. Seaside Paint & Lacquer Co.California Court of Appeal · 1957
  4. Alex Foods, Inc. v. MetcalfeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  5. Cottingham v. EnglerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1944

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API