Legal Opinion

Wayne Acton and Judy Acton, Guardians Ad Litem for James Acton v. Vernonia School District 47j

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 5, 1994No. 92-35520PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judge:

Wayne and Judy Acton, guardians ad litem for James Acton, appeal the district court’s judgment at trial that the Vernonia School District’s mandatory random drug testing policy for participants in interscholastic athletics (“the Policy”) does not violate James’s right to be free from unreasonable searches, under either Article I, Section 9 of the Oregon Constitution or the Fourth Amendment. We reverse.

BACKGROUND

The District runs two schools, Washington Grade School and Vernonia High School. Several teachers in the District testified that prior to 1985 drugs and…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. West Virginia State Board of Education v. BarnetteSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  5. Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Vernonia School District 47J v. ActonSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Vernonia School District 47J v. ActonSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. (PC) Bolds v. LuevanosDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
  4. (PC) Foster v. ClarkDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023
  5. (PC) Foster v. ClarkDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API