Legal Opinion
State v. Heilman
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided December 30, 2005No. CC 001139142; CA A116697; SC S51479PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDurham, J.
In this criminal case, defendant challenges the 20-year enhancement of his prison sentence as a “dangerous offender” under ORS 161.725(1)(a). His primary contention is that the trial court erred in sentencing him as a dangerous offender because the state had not pleaded in the indictment the facts necessary to support such an enhancement. The trial court rejected that argument before applying a 20-year enhancement to his sentence. The Court of Appeals affirmed the judgment without an opinion. State v. Heilman, 193 Or App 329, 92 P3d 767 (2004). On review, we conclude that the trial court did…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Hurtado v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. SiersWashington Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. DagueCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2006
- State v. LaceyOregon Supreme Court · 2018
- State v. Herrera-LopezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
- State v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.