Legal Opinion

State v. Lacey

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 13, 2018No. CC 11CR0121, 12CR0202; (A156850); (SC S064616)PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDuncan, J.

**173In these criminal cases, which were consolidated for trial, defendant waived his right to counsel and invoked his right to self-representation after being warned that, if he engaged in disruptive conduct during his jury trial, he would be removed from the courtroom, and the trial would proceed without anyone present to represent him. Despite that warning and numerous others during the trial, defendant engaged in disruptive conduct throughout the trial, and, before closing argument, he informed the trial court that he would not abide by its order prohibiting him from referring to…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  5. Illinois v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. LinkOregon Supreme Court · 2021
  2. State v. WarlickNebraska Supreme Court · 2021
  3. State v. RobertsOregon Supreme Court · 2026
  4. State v. PeltierCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
  5. State v. WarlickNebraska Supreme Court · 2021

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API