State v. Siers
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Alexander, J.*
¶1 We granted the State’s motion for discretionary review of a decision of the Court of Appeals reversing Brian Siers’s conviction on one count of second degree assault. That court reversed the conviction because the State did not allege an aggravating factor in the charging document. In reaching its conclusion, the Court of Appeals relied on a decision of this court on the issue of whether aggravating factors must be charged in the information, State v. Powell, 167 Wn.2d 672, 223 P.3d 493 (2009) (plurality opinion). We take this opportunity to revisit our decision in Powell on…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Hurtado v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- State v. KjorsvikWashington Supreme Court · 1991
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- State v. Azad Haji AbdullahIdaho Supreme Court · 2015
- State v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 2014
- State v. ZillyetteWashington Supreme Court · 2013
- State v. LynchWashington Supreme Court · 2013
- State v. McEnroeWashington Supreme Court · 2014
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.