Legal Opinion

State v. Dague

Court of Appeals of Alaska

Decided September 15, 2006No. A-8914PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MANNHEIMER, Judge.

In Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296, 124 S.Ct. 2531, 159 L.Ed.2d 403 (2004), the United States Supreme Court held that when the maximum sentence for a defendant’s crime hinges on an issue of fact, aside from the defendant’s prior criminal convictions, the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution guarantees the defendant a right to jury trial on this issue of fact, and a right to demand that the government prove this fact beyond a reasonable doubt. 1

Under the pre-March 2005 version of Alaska’s presumptive sentencing law, a sentencing judge was authorized to…

2Cases cited66 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  5. Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. SiersWashington Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Lockuk v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2007
  3. Active v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2007
  4. Smart v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2006
  5. Surrells v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2006

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API