Rider v. Clark
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
COOPER,C.
—-Action to recover damages for personal injuries. Plaintiff recovered a verdict, and judgment was entered thereon. Appellants made a .motion for a new trial, which was denied, and this appeal is from the judgment and order denying the motion. The appellants were the owners of a three-story brick building on the east side of Sutter Street, in the city of Stockton, The sidewalk in front of said building was of the latest improved concrete, over twelve feet in width. In the sidewalk on the east side of Sutter Street, being the west side of the building, there is an opening for the use…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- McCarthy v. . the City of SyracuseNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
- McAlpin v. . PowellNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
- Fisher v. ThirkellMichigan Supreme Court · 1870
- Barry v. TerkildsenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Kalis v. ShattuckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Laurenzi v. VranizanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- City & County of San Francisco v. Ho SingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- Runyon v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- Dennis v. City of OrangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Mitchell v. ThomasMontana Supreme Court · 1932
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.