Legal Opinion
City & County of San Francisco v. Ho Sing
California Supreme Court
Decided October 24, 1958No. S. F. 19977PublishedCited by 54 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCarter, J.
This is an appeal by the city and county of San Francisco, a municipal corporation, from a judgment after defendants’, Ho Sing and Ho Lum Shee, demurrer to its complaint had been sustained without leave to amend.
Mr. and Mrs. Ho purchased a building in San Francisco. Their predecessors in title had installed a sidewalk skylight in front of the building. This skylight was over a basement which was maintained by defendants Ho. During the course of defendants’ possession of the building, the sidewalk skylight developed a crack two inches wide and 18 inches long. On August 24,1952, one Mrs. Wagner…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Washington Gas Light Co. v. District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Robbins v. Chicago CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- Chicago City v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1863
- Cole v. RushCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Gulf, Mobile & Ohio Railroad v. Arthur Dixon Transfer Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1951
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- American Motorcycle Assn. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Fifield Manor v. FinstonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- Herrero v. AtkinsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Cahill Bros., Inc. v. Clementina Co.California Court of Appeal · 1962
- Western Steamship Lines, Inc. v. San Pedro Peninsula HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.