Legal Opinion
United States v. Weinstock
District Court, D. Utah
Decided September 7, 1994No. 2:94-cv-00010PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM & ORDER '
BOYCE, United States Magistrate Judge.
The defendant, Frank J. Weinstock, has made a motion in limine pursuant to Rule 104, F.R.E. to prohibit the Government from offering or attempting to offer into evidence an out-of-court declaration of Dr. Vladimir Skondia, deceased. The defendant is charged by indictment with securities fraud in connection with the purchase and sale of securities (Counts 1 and 2, 15 U.S.C. § 78j(b), 17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5 and 15 U.S.C. § 78ff); interstate transportation of stolen property (Counts 3 and 4, 18 U.S.C. § 2314); and mail fraud (Count 5, 18…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Idaho v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Mattox v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- United States National Bank v. Independent Insurance Agents of America, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Stahl v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
- Silverstein v. ChaseCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- Smith v. Litchford & Christopher, P.A. (In Re Bay Vista of Virginia, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 2010
- Silverstein ex rel. Estate of Silverstein v. ChaseCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- Bradley v Wells Fargo BankDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2014
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.