Legal Opinion

Stahl v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided September 24, 1997No. 43S03-9709-CR-511PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON PETITION TO TRANSFER

BOEHM, Justice.

Defendant Randy Stahl was convicted of defrauding a financial institution (a bank) and theft. Both crimes turned on unauthorized withdrawals from an account owned by another. Stahl contends that the trial court erred in admitting a crucial piece of evidence, an affidavit supplied to the bank by the account owner to prove Stahl was unauthorized, under the exceptions to the hearsay rule for business records and for documents affecting an interest in property. The Court of Appeals affirmed. Stahl v. State, 675 N.E.2d 1130 (Ind.Ct.App.1997). Stahl requests…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Dutton v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Idaho v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Lockhart v. NelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Holmes v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Everroad v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1992

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Cook v. Whitsell-ShermanIndiana Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Carpenter v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Miller v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Speybroeck v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. State v. WaltonIndiana Supreme Court · 1999

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API