Legal Opinion
Miller v. AT & T NETWORK SYSTEMS
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided September 21, 1989No. Civ. 86-411-FRPublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FRYE, District Judge:
The matters before the court are:
1. Defendant, AT & T Network Systems’ (AT & T’s), motion (# 44) for summary judgment on the amended complaint of plaintiff, Daryl A. Miller, pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 56; and
2. Miller’s motion (# 41) for partial summary judgment on the issue of liability pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56 and for a separate trial on the issue of damages pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 42(b).
BACKGROUND
Miller was employed by AT & T or its predecessor, Western Electric Company, from October 24, 1964 through July 2, 1985. In his original complaint, Miller al leged four…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- British Airways Board, 1 v. The Boeing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- Thomas Jasany v. United States Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
- Louis P. Forrisi v. Otis R. BowenCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1986
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Mary Ellen Byrne v. Board of Education, School of West Allis-West MilwaukeeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- Cynthia Thompson v. Holy Family Hospital, a Division of Dominican Health ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Betty Gupton v. Commonwealth of Virginia Ray D. Pethel William BryantCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994
- Martin Jimeno, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Mobil Oil Corporation, Defendant-Appellee-Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Martinell v. Montana Power Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1994
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.