McGillicuddy v. New Brunswick Fire Insurance
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtPemberton, J.
— Appellant instituted this action against respondent to recover $2,500 upon á fire insurance policy covering certain personal property destroyed by fire.
After evidence was introduced on the part of appellant, he rested his case. The respondent submitted the case without evidence, and the court directed a verdict for the appellant in the sum of $2,500. Thereafter the trial court granted a motion of respondent for judgment notwithstanding the verdict and dismissed the action, from which judgment of dismissal this appeal is taken.
The principal point in controversy is whether or not the service…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Ramat v. California Insurance Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1917
- Hatcher v. Sovereign Fire Assurance Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1912
- Boskovich v. Union Assurance Society, Ltd.Washington Supreme Court · 1917
- Ferdenando v. Milwaukee Mechanics' InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1914
3Cited by4 opinions
- Oregon Automobile Insurance v. SalzbergWashington Supreme Court · 1975
- George v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1931
- Tierney v. Safeco InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1963
- Oregon Automobile Insurance v. SalzbergCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1974