Ramat v. California Insurance Co.
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Ronald, J., entered February 26, 1916, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiffs, in an action upon an insurance policy, tried on the merits. Reversed.
1Opinion of the Court
Fullerton, J. —
On August 3, 1914, the respondent, plaintiff below, applied to the resident agent of the appellant at the city of Seattle for a fire insurance policy covering his household effects, then situate in a certain dwelling house in the city named. Insurance was granted him to the amount of $500,' and later on a policy was made out and forwarded him, reaching him on the next day. He paid the required premium at the time of the application. The policy was in form that required by the statute — a form known as the New York Standard policy — and contained, among others, the following…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Staats v. Pioneer InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1909
3Cited by10 opinions
- Logan v. New York Life InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1919
- Stebbins v. Westchester Fire InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1921
- Robbins v. Milwaukee Mechanics InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1918
- National Liberty Ins. Co. v. MilliganCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1926
- Gregerson v. Phenix Fire InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1918
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.