Legal Opinion

Garcia v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided July 24, 1989No. 88-98PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEIMBACK, District Judge.

This appeal is from appellant’s conviction for the burglary of a Cheyenne Convenience Plus store. A motion to suppress defendant’s confession was filed prior to trial. A hearing was held, and the motion was denied. After the trial, defendant filed a motion for new trial contending that statements made by one juror to others during deliberations constituted an extraneous prejudicial presentation of evidence. This motion was also denied after a hearing on the matter. It is from this judgment and these denials that defendant appeals.

We affirm.

Appellant presents three…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Colorado v. ConnellySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Smith v. PhillipsSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Crane v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Bram v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Wilson v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State v. JamesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
  3. Dice v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Caldararo Ex Rel. Caldararo v. Vanderbilt UniversityCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1990
  5. Peña v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2004

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API