Legal Opinion
Gulf Trading Co. v. Radcliff
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided October 20, 1927No. 1 Div. 437PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBotjldin, J.
The suit is to recover alleged commission due a real estate broker.
The complaint contained the common count for work and labor done, and a special amended count No. 3, as follows:
“The plaintiff claims of the defendant $3,326.-25 damages for the breach of an agreement entered into on, to wit, the 23d day of May, 1925, as follows, that is to say, that the defendant employed the plaintiff to procure for it a purchaser for certain land, sometimes known as the Wilson. property, and sometimes as the Goelet place, and agreed to pay the plaintiff for obtaining such purchaser 5 per cent, of the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Handley v. ShafferSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
- Sayre v. Wilson & IngramSupreme Court of Alabama · 1888
- Henderson v. VincentSupreme Court of Alabama · 1887
- Chambers v. SeaySupreme Court of Alabama · 1882
- Alford v. CreaghAlabama Court of Appeals · 1913
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Ray v. Midfield Park, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1975
- Bull v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Alabama · 1950
- Salvo v. CourseySupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
- Buck Creek Cotton Mills v. StokelySupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
- First Nat. Bank of Birmingham v. ChichesterCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1977
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.