Legal Opinion

Buck Creek Cotton Mills v. Stokely

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 14, 1938No. 7 Div. 491PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Justice.

The several assignments of error are to the effect that there was error in the decree holding that appellee was entitled to specific performance of the contract set out in the bill and injunction, and for an accounting in equity.

The averments of the bill as to inducements of the contract, extension, and execution are as follows:

“Complainant further avers that following . conferences with said respondents there was prepared, submitted to and approved by said respondents a written agreement, a copy of which is attached hereto and marked Exhibit ‘C’ and made a pari hereof as if…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Hunt v. Rousmanier's AdministratorsSupreme Court of the United States · 1823
  2. Grimsley v. First Ave. Coal & Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  3. Dewberry v. Bank of Standing RockSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  4. Iron Age Publishing Co. v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1887
  5. Julian v. WoolbertSupreme Court of Alabama · 1919

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Jacksonville Public Service Corp. v. Profile Cotton MillsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
  2. Creel v. Birmingham Trust National BankDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1974
  3. Sarokhan v. Fair Lawn Memorial Hospital, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1964
  4. Doss v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
  5. George Moulton, Inc. v. LanganSupreme Court of Alabama · 1970

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API