Legal Opinion

First Nat. Bank of Birmingham v. Chichester

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided September 28, 1977No. Civ. 1114 and Civ. 1114-APublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an action by a real estate broker for compensation brought upon breach of (1) an oral contract, (2) an implied contract, (3) a quasi-contract and (4) for work and labor. There was a general jury verdict for plaintiff and judgment in the amount of $9,534.34. Defendants appeal. We reverse.

Hudson and Boriss, joint owners of certain vacant real estate in Vestavia Hills, signed a sales contract agreeing to sell that real estate for $75,000. The purchaser was not named in the contract but plaintiff was designated agent to negotiate the sale for a commission of 6%. The date of the contract…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Handley v. ShafferSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
  2. Merchants Nat. Bank of Mobile v. CotnamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
  3. Dillon v. NixCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1975
  4. BOARD OF WATER AND SEWER COM'RS OF CITY OF MOBILE v. McDonaldCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1975
  5. Gulf Trading Co. v. RadcliffSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Mellos v. SilvermanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
  2. Ex Parte CTF Hotel Management Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1998
  3. Mitchell Bros. Contractors, Inc. v. BensonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1984
  4. Melvin v. ParkerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  5. Chichester v. First National Bank of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1978

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API