Legal Opinion

Bull v. Armstrong

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 26, 1950No. 6 Div. 69PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIMPSON, Justice.

Appellant, J. C. Bull, sued appellees for damages for maliciously and without probable cause unlawfully searching his dwelling house against his will and without his voluntary consent. From a judgment for the defendants the plaintiff has appealed.

Error is sought to be predicated on the refusal by the trial -court of certain written charges requested by the plaintiff and the giving of other written charges for the defendant. A brief résumé of the evidence, in application to certain well-settled principles of law, will suffice, we think, to illustrate that error did prevail in…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Meno v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1925
  2. American Nat. Bank & Trust Co. v. PowellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  3. Baker Sand & Gravel Co. v. Rogers Plumbing & Heating Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1934
  4. Dixon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1928
  5. Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1926

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Bumper v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Widgeon v. Eastern Shore Hospital CenterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
  3. Bott v. DeLandUtah Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Ray v. Midfield Park, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1975
  5. Brown v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1964

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API