Legal Opinion

Ray v. Midfield Park, Inc.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided February 13, 1975No. SC 742PublishedCited by 69 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON REHEARING

MADDOX, Justice.

The sole question presented here is: Was summary judgment appropriate? The case has been here before. Ray and Plough v. Midfield Park, Inc., 289 Ala. 137, 266 So.2d 291 (1972). The facts surrounding the controversy are contained in that opinion and are not set out fully here, but succinctly stated, the dispute involves the question of whether the lessee gave notice to renew his lease within the time set out in the lease.

Lessor claims that lessee failed to give proper notice to renew and filed a declaratory judgment action to have its rights determined. The matter…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. O'Neal v. O'NealSupreme Court of Alabama · 1969
  2. Bull v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Alabama · 1950
  3. Gulf Trading Co. v. RadcliffSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  4. Laird v. Columbia Loan & Investment Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  5. Ray v. Midfield Park, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1972

3Cited by69 opinions

  1. Ex Parte General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1999
  2. White Sands Group, LLC v. PRS II, LLCSupreme Court of Alabama · 2008
  3. Fulton v. Advertiser Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1980
  4. SHADES, ETC. v. Cobbs, Allen & Hall Mortg. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1980
  5. White Sands Group, L.L.C. v. Prs II, L.L.C.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2009

64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API