Legal Opinion
Houghton v. Kuehnrich
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 10, 1920No. Civ. No. 2075PublishedCited by 10 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
ELLISON, P. J., pro tem.
Plaintiff sued defendant for four thousand dollars real estate commission for procuring one Ralph Granger to assent to the terms of an agreement for exchange of real estate, which was drawn by defendant’s attorney. The cause was tried before a jury, which rendered a verdict for four thousand dollars in favor of the plaintiff. The trial court granted defendant’s motion for a new trial, and from this order the plaintiff has appealed.
The pleadings admit that the defendant executed and delivered a certain instrument, which is set forth in paragraph I of the complaint, and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Jauman v. McCusickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Jennings v. JordanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916
- Brion v. CahillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
- Stewart v. BowieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- Ketcham v. AxelsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1913
3Cited by10 opinions
- Lawrence Block Co. v. PalstonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- K. Lundeen Corp. v. BarlowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Ira Garson Realty Co. v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Lind v. HueneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Weber v. DobynsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.