Legal Opinion

Libby Hill Seafood Restaurants, Inc. v. Owens

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 21, 1983No. 8221SC753PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HILL, Judge.

The sole question for decision is whether plaintiffs evidence, when considered in the light most favorable to plaintiff, is sufficient as a matter of law for submission to the jury. We hold that it is not. However, even if sufficient evidence of wrongdoing has been offered, plaintiff is contributorily negligent as a matter of law. We therefore affirm the judgment below.

Plaintiff’s evidence tends to show defendants Owens acquired a tract of land including the subject lot from the City of Winston-Salem which for some 35 years had used the area as a trash dump. The Owenses thereafter…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Ragsdale v. KennedySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  2. Johnson v. Phoenix Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  3. Roberts v. William N. & Kate B. Reynolds Mem. ParkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  4. Calloway v. WyattSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  5. Clark v. BodycombeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Concrete Service Corp. v. Investors Group, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  2. Pleasant Valley Promenade v. Lechmere, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
  3. Robertson v. BoydCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
  4. Rountree v. Chowan Cty.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017
  5. Winston Realty Co., Inc. v. GHG, INC.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1985

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API