Legal Opinion

Potts v. Burnette

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 6, 1981No. 108PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARLTON, Justice.

I

This case arose out of the long-continued use by plaintiffs of a roadway over defendants’ property to get to and from plaintiffs’ land. Plaintiffs brought this action to establish their right to use defendants’ roadway by virtue of an easement by prescription and to enjoin defendants from interfering with plaintiffs’ use of the road.

In their complaint plaintiffs alleged that they and their predecessors in title had openly and continuously used a road leading from the lands of plaintiffs across the lands of defendants to State Road No. 1149 and that the use of the road by…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Kelly v. International Harvester CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  2. Dickinson v. PakeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  3. Summey v. CauthenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  4. Clark v. BodycombeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  5. Daughtry v. TurnageSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. Dailey v. Integon General Ins. Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  2. Smith v. PriceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  3. West v. SlickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  4. Carson v. County of DrewSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  5. Striefel v. Charles-Keyt-Leaman PartnershipSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1999

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API