Legal Opinion

Colton v. Huntleigh USA Corp.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 21, 2005No. 100,051PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmondson, J.

¶ 1 The three plaintiffs were employees of Huntleigh USA Corporation (Huntleigh) and worked as pre-board security screeners at Will Rogers International Airport in OHa-homa City. Employees brought an action in the District Court for wages that were unpaid by Huntleigh. Huntleigh argued that the state court lacked jurisdiction; the District Court agreed and sustained Huntleigh’s motion to dismiss. We conclude that the District Court has jurisdiction of Employees’ wage claim.

¶ 2 Huntleigh had contracts with air carriers to provide security screening of passengers. After the terrorist attacks on…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. State Energy Resources Conservation & Development CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Provident Tradesmens Bank & Trust Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Boyle v. United Technologies Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Conyers v. RossidesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
  2. Reeds v. WalkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
  3. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. MothershedSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2011
  4. IN RE: INITIATIVE PETITION NO. 397, STATE QUESTION NO. 767Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2014
  5. State ex rel. Board of Regents ex rel. Campus Disciplinary Council v. LucasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2013

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API