Legal Opinion

3rd Eye Surveillance, LLC v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided April 5, 2016No. 15-501CPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Patent case; government’s motions to notify eight entities alleged to have an interest in the subject matter of the action; RCFC 14(b); standard for an “alleged interest” under the notice provision of-RCFC 14(b)

OPINION AND ORDER

LETTOW, Judge.

Pending before the court in this patent infringement case brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1498(a) are motions by the defendant (“United States” or the “government”) to notify eight entities, each of which “is alleged to have an interest in the subject .matter of the suit.” Rule 14(b) of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (“RCFC”). 1…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
  5. Decca Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1980

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. 3rd Eye Surveillance, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018
  2. 3rd Eye Surveillance, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2019
  3. Science Applications International Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API