Legal Opinion
Allied Oil & Supply, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided April 1, 2004No. 03-2673 CPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER and OPINION
DAMICH, Chief Judge.
On January 22, 2004, Warren Distribution, Inc. (hereinafter ‘Warren”) filed its Motion to Quash the Notice to Third Party (hereinafter “Warren’s Mot.”). For the reasons given below, Warren’s motion to quash is DENIED.
I. Background
In August 1998, the United States Army Corp of Engineers, acting on behalf of the United States (hereinafter “Defendant”), entered into a contract with Allied Oil & Supply, Inc. (hereinafter “Plaintiff” or “Allied”) for the supply and delivery of lubricating oil. Brief in Support of Warren Distribution, Inc.’s Mot. to Quash the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Martin v. WilksSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- South Corporation and Seal Fleet, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1982
- Rolls-Royce Limited, Derby, England, a British Company v. The United States and United Aircraft Corporation, Defendant-IntervenorUnited States Court of Claims · 1966
- Bowser, Inc. v. The United States and General Steel Tank Co., Inc., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
- Carrier Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1976
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Uusi, LLC, and Oldnar Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- 3rd Eye Surveillance, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011