Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Wise & Jackson v. Nott

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 28, 1926No. 2671PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHall, C. J.

The appellee sued Wise & Jackson, a partnership alleged to be composed of W. A. Wise, —■—■—■ Jackson, and C. C. Peters, for $600 rent claimed to be due him for a lot in Burkburnett. Based upon that action, he sued out a writ of garnishment against the Humble Oil & Refining Company. The appellee in this ease recovered a judgment in the principal action against the firm of Wise & Jackson, which has this day been affirmed by this court.

The Humble Oil & Refining Company answered in this case, and Wise & Jackson moved the court to quash the affidavit, bond, and writ of garnishment upon grounds…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Seinsheimer v. FlanaganCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1897
  2. Stiff v. FisherCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1893
  3. Tinsley v. ArdreyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1901
  4. Hall v. ParryCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1909
  5. Plowman v. EastonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1897

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Cleveland v. San Antonio Building & Loan Ass'nTexas Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Youngblood v. YoungbloodCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1942
  3. Texas Nat. Bank of Fort Worth v. First Nat. Bank of LipanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  4. Welsh v. WoodsHawaii Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Big Four Shoe Stores Co. v. LudlamCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API