Legal Opinion
Plowman v. Easton
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided January 16, 1897PublishedCited by 8 opinions
Appeal from Grayson. Tried below before Hon. Don A. Bliss.
1Opinion of the Court
LIGHTFOOT, Chief Justice.
Appellee has filed no brief, and we adopt the statement of appellant. The conclusions of the court below are as follows:
“1. On March 7, 1895, in cause No. 8331 on the docket of the District Court of Grayson County, styled Dan Plowman v. A. B. Person, the plaintiff Dan Plowman filed an affidavit and bond for writ of garnishment, to be served on W. M. Easton, the garnishee in this cause. The writ of garnishment was duly issued, and was served on said W. M. Easton on March 9, 1895. In his affidavit for the writ of garnishment, the said plaintiff deposed that the said A.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Kelly v. GibbsTexas Supreme Court · 1892
- City of Dallas v. Western Electric Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1892
- Farrar v. Edwin Bates & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1881
3Cited by8 opinions
- Wise & Jackson v. NottCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
- Lopez v. Mexico-Texas Petroline & Asphalt Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1926
- Osceola Mercantile Co. v. NaborsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
- Griswold v. TarbellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
- Becker v. CooperCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.