Cleveland v. San Antonio Building & Loan Ass'n
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Smedley
The trial court sustained the motion of respondent Bertha Otterstetter, defendant in the principal suit, to quash a writ of garnishment issued on the application of petitioner Exie M. Cleveland, plaintiff in that suit, against respondent San Antonio Building and Loan Association as garnishee. The Court of Civil Appeals affirmed the judgment. 223 S. W. (2d) 224.
As stated in the opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals, only two questions are presented for decision: The first, whether the cause of action as set out in petitioner’s pleadings is one that *214will support the issuance of a writ of…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Philpott v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- McCall v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- Kildare Lumber Co. v. Atlanta BankTexas Supreme Court · 1897
- Tarkinton v. C. E. Broussard & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1879
- Hochstadler Bros. v. SamTexas Supreme Court · 1889
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- In Re Texas American Express, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2005
- Scott v. ConnerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966
- 21 Turtle Creek Square, Ltd. v. New York State Teachers' Retirement SystemCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
- Barbouti v. LysandrouDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
- Corrigan v. HeardCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1949
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.