Legal Opinion

Big Four Shoe Stores Co. v. Ludlam

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided July 15, 1933No. 12879PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LATTIMORE, Justice.

Appellee sued the Holland Shoe Company for wrongful discharge from the latter’s employ, alleging a year’s contract as a shoe saleman at $600 per month, appellee to pay his own expenses, and that three months before termination of said contract and at a time when his duties would not have carried him away from home, and thus he would have been at no expense in selling his master’s products, he was wrongfully discharged.

Said Holland Shoe Company was a nonresident and was served with nonresident notice. Ancillary writs of garnishment were sued out and served on appellants.

Judgm…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kildare Lumber Co. v. Atlanta BankTexas Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Hochstadler Bros. v. SamTexas Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Fleming v. PringleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1899
  4. Wise & Jackson v. NottCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  5. Gray v. MerrittTexas Commission of Appeals · 1926

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Youngblood v. YoungbloodCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1942
  2. Butler v. McDanielCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API