Legal Opinion
Uniloc USA, Inc. v. Microsoft Corp.
District Court, D. Rhode Island
Decided March 16, 2009No. C.A. 03-440 SPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON MOTIONS IN LIMINE AND TRIAL MANAGEMENT ISSUES
WILLIAM E. SMITH, District Judge.
Before the Court in this patent case are numerous motions in limine, including motions by both parties to exclude expert damages witnesses under Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharm., Inc., 509 U.S. 579, 113 S.Ct. 2786, 125 L.Ed.2d 469 (1993). A jury trial is scheduled to begin on March 23, 2009. Uniloc USA, Inc. and Uniloc Singapore Private Limited (“Uniloc”) claim Microsoft Corporation’s (“Microsoft”) Product Activation technology (“MPA”) in software products such as Windows and Office infringes Claims 12 and 19…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. United States Plywood Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1970
- Ntp, Inc. v. Research in Motion, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Microsoft Corp. v. At&t Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Uniloc USA, Inc. v. Microsoft Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
- Abbott Laboratories v. Sandoz, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2010
- Uniloc USA, Inc. v. Microsoft Corp.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 2009
- Prism Technologies, LLC v. Adobe Systems, Inc.District Court, D. Nebraska · 2012
- Ravo v. Covidien LPDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.