Legal Opinion
Prism Technologies, LLC v. Adobe Systems, Inc.
District Court, D. Nebraska
Decided July 17, 2012No. 8:10CV220PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
LYLE E. STROM, Senior District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the motion of plaintiff Prism Technologies, LLC (“Prism”), filed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37(a), to compel defendant Symantec Corporation (“Symantec”) to respond to various discovery requests (Filing No. 70k, with accompanying brief and index of evidence, Filing Nos. 705 and 706). Sym-antec filed an opposing brief with indices of evidence (Filing Nos. 732, 73k, and 735), and Prism filed a reply brief (Filing No. 7k7). The Court finds that the motion to compel should be granted.
I.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Gaylon Hofer v. Mack Trucks, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
- Ntp, Inc. v. Research in Motion, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Uniloc USA, Inc. v. Microsoft Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hurd v. Union Pacific Railroad Co.District Court, D. Nebraska · 2024
- Nordstrom v. City of WahooDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 2025
- Seals v. Union Pacific Railroad Co.District Court, D. Nebraska · 2024
- Wilbur-Ellis Company LLC v. GompertDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 2022