Ravo v. Covidien LP
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JOY FLOWERS CONTI, Chief Judge.
In this case, inventors Biagio Ravo and Enrico Nicolo (collectively “Ravo”) assert claims for patent infringement and accuse Covidien LP (“Covidien”) of infringing United States Patent No. 6,117,148 (the “'148 Patent”), entitled Intraluminal Anastomotic Device. The '148 Patent describes two embodiments of a surgical device that can be used to resect a section of bowel (or any hollow organ) through intus-susception followed by anastomosis, in turn preventing the intraluminal contents from contaminating the body cavity. (ECF No. 54 at 1.)
I.…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. United States Plywood Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1970
- Lucent Technologies, Inc. v. Gateway, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- I4i Ltd. Partnership v. Microsoft Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Acantha LLC v. DePuy Synthes Sales IncDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2019
- BARRY v. DEPUY SYNTHES COMPANIESDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2023
- Longitude Licensing Limited and 138 East LCD Advancements Limited v. BOE Technology Group Co., LTD.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2026
- MOSKOWITZ FAMILY LLC v. GLOBUS MEDICAL, INC.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2023