Legal Opinion

Grimes v. Baker

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided November 12, 1937No. 30000PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPaine, J.

This is an action by a stockholder to compel another stockholder, who had recommended the investment, to carry out a promise to save her from loss in the event the stock went down.

The first opinion of this court appears in 132 Neb. 898, *518273 N. W. 789, in which a statement of the principal allegations of the pleadings and a discussion of some of the Nebraska cases in relation thereto are briefly set out.

The brief in support of a rehearing by plaintiff and appellee charged that the former decision was not supported by any evidence, but was based upon a misconception of the facts, and that…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Justice v. . LangNew York Court of Appeals · 1870
  2. Trenholm v. KloepperNebraska Supreme Court · 1911
  3. State ex rel. Leidigh v. HolcombNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Virtue v. StanleyWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Grimes v. BakerNebraska Supreme Court · 1937

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Sooner Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Oklahoma Central Credit UnionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  2. Estate of Allen v. AllenNebraska Supreme Court · 1947
  3. King v. SchmallNebraska Supreme Court · 1953
  4. SOONER FED. S & L v. Okl. Cent. Cr. UnionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API