Virtue v. Stanley
Washington Supreme Court
Cross-appeals from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Tallman, J., entered July 2, 1914, in favor of the defendants, in an action on a promissory note and to foreclose a mortgage, tried to the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.
Plaintiff’s action against the Stanleys and Mrs. Harris, former wife of Frank M. Stanley, was to recover $4,047.85 on a promissory note against Stanley and his former wife, and to foreclose a real estate mortgage upon lots 7, 8 and 9, in block 93, Lake Union Shore Lands, in King county. There was no dispute as to the execution of the note and mortgage nor any plea of payment.
By way of defenses and cross-complaint, respondents interposed five affirmative defenses. In each affirmative defense and cross-complaint, it was averred that George A. Virtue was the true and equitable owner of the note…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Walker v. McMurchieWashington Supreme Court · 1911
- Wright v. SuydamWashington Supreme Court · 1913
- Garvey v. BarkleyWashington Supreme Court · 1909
- Texas & St. L. Ry. Co. v. RustUnited States Circuit Court · 1883
- Opsjon v. Evard EngeboWashington Supreme Court · 1913
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Sooner Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Oklahoma Central Credit UnionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
- Keylon v. InchWashington Supreme Court · 1934
- University Properties, Inc. v. MossWashington Supreme Court · 1964
- Dillon v. RinglemanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Lakes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1937
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.