Legal Opinion

Grimes v. Baker

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 11, 1937No. 30000PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPaine, J.

Plaintiff brought suit in the district court to recover damages sustained by reason of defendant’s failure and refusal to fulfil a verbal statement to save plaintiff harmless from *899any loss she might suffer by reason of her purchase of shares of stock of the Universal Gypsum & Lime Company, of Chicago, Illinois, recommended by him.

Defendant alleged in his answer that he acted purely as the agent of the plaintiff in the purchase of said stock from George E. Sipple, its owner, and that the agreement alleged by plaintiff to repurchase the stock was barred by the statute of limitations, and void…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Griffin v. Bankers Realty Investment Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Trenholm v. KloepperNebraska Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Grotte v. RachmanNebraska Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Stratbucker v. Bankers Realty Investment Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1921

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Grimes v. BakerNebraska Supreme Court · 1937
  2. King v. SchmallNebraska Supreme Court · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API