Legal Opinion
XL Specialty Insurance v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided June 8, 2004No. Slip Op. 04-61; Court 01-00900PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CARMAN, Judge.
Pursuant to USCIT Rule 12(b)(1), Defendant moves to dismiss this action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Plaintiff, XL Specialty Insurance Co. (Surety for Cosmos Electronics Co.) (“XL Speciality”), alleges jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1581(a) (2000). Defendant argues that XL Specialty failed to file a proper protest. Plaintiff opposes Defendant’s motion and moves, pursuant to USCIT Rule 15(a), for leave to amend its complaint. This Court has jurisdiction to resolve this matter under 28 U.S.C. § 1581(a). As discussed below, this Court grants Defendant’s Motion to…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Fujitsu General America, Inc. (Successor-In-Interest to Teknika Electronics Corp.) v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Davies v. ArthurSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Mattel, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1974
- Computime, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Saab Cars Usa, Inc. v. United States, Defendant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Chrysal USA, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2012
- Cisco Systems, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2011
- Ovan International, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2015
- An Giang Fisheries Import & Export Joint Stock Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2015
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.