Legal Opinion
Mattel, Inc. v. United States
United States Customs Court
Decided June 5, 1974No. C.D. 4547PublishedCited by 53 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MALETZ, Judge:
These six consolidated actions come before the court on plaintiff’s motion for judgment on the pleadings and defendant’s cross-motion for summary judgment. The merit of plaintiff’s claim as to the proper classification of the importations is not in dispute. The sole issue, rather, is whether certain “Sec. 520(c) request letters” (as they are characterized in the complaint) constitute valid protests within the meaning of section 514 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1514), 1 and thereby invest this court with jurisdiction over the actions.
The importations in…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Arthur v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Davies v. ArthurSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Schell's Executors v. FauchéSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- C. J. Tower & Sons of Buffalo, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1972
- Greely's Administrator v. BurgessSupreme Court of the United States · 1856
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Saab Cars Usa, Inc. v. United States, Defendant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Computime, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- Swisher International, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
- Koike Aronson, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- Computime, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1985
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.