Legal Opinion

Krummell Imports v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided April 28, 1955No. 59010; protest 231680-K/6054 (Chicago)PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Oliver, Chief Judge:

This case relates to merchandise, assessed with duty at the rate of 35 per centum ad valorem as toys, not specially provided for, under paragraph 1513 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by T. D. 52739, supplemented by T. D. 52820, and claimed to be properly dutiable at only 16% per centum ad valorem as manufactures of wood, not specially provided for, under-paragraph 412 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by T. D. 52373, supplemented by T. D. 52476.

Five samples of the articles in question were received in evidence (plaintiff’s collective exhibit 1). They were…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. J. E. Bernard & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1951

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Fred Bronner Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
  2. Furniture Import Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
  3. Friedman v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API