The Laitram Corporation and Intralox, Inc. v. Cambridge Wire Cloth Company
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MARKEY, Chief Judge.
The Laitram Corporation and Intralox, Inc. (Laitram) appeal from a judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, No. S 83-3126, finding that the Cambridge Wire Cloth Company (CWC) did not infringe Patent Nos. 3,870,141, 4,051,949, and Re.30,341. We reverse and remand.
Background
In 1983, Laitram sued CWC for infringement of U.S. Patents 3,870,141 (’141), 4,051,949 (’949), 4,159,763 (’763) and Re.30,-341 (’341). The accused products were CWC’s modular plastic conveyor belt (CAM-CLEAN I) and a belt drive system. In 1985, the U.S. District Court for…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Sri International v. Matsushita Electric Corporation of America and Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- Topliff v. TopliffSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- The Perkin-Elmer Corporation, a Corporation of New York v. Computervision Corporation, a Corporation of DelawareCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Pennwalt Corporation, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Durand-Wayland, Inc., Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by116 opinions
- Comark Communications, Inc. v. Harris CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Lawrence B. Lockwood v. American Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- Wahpeton Canvas Co. v. Frontier, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
- Samuel Gart v. Logitech, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Interactive Gift Express, Inc. v. Compuserve Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
111 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.