Legal Opinion

Trio Process Corporation, in No. 71-1295 v. L. Goldstein's Sons, Inc., in No. 71-1296

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided May 22, 1972No. 71-1295, 71-1296PublishedCited by 101 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

ADAMS, Circuit Judge.

In this patent infringement case, we must first determine the validity of United States Patent No. 3,076,421, issued to Albert W. Spitz (Spitz) and owned by Trio Process Corp. (Trio), and then decide whether the district court’s finding of willful infringement is correct.

The primary issue of validity is whether the process disclosed in the patent was obvious to a practitioner with ordinary skill in the appropriate art at the time the process was developed. The infringement issue can be resolved by determining whether Trio is precluded by “file-wrapper…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  3. Greenbelt Cooperative Publishing Assn., Inc. v. BreslerSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Eibel Process Co. v. Minnesota & Ontario Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
  5. United States v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by101 opinions

  1. Underwater Devices Incorporated v. Morrison-Knudsen Company, Inc., Morrison-Knudsen Company, Inc. v. Lester A. Haug, Don W. Schmid and Herman GuntherCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
  2. Morrow v. New Moon Homes, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Universal Athletic Sales Co., a Corporation v. American Gym, Recreational & Athletic Equipment Corporation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
  4. Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, Cross v. Nicolet Instrument Corporation, a Wisconsin Corporation, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
  5. Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc. v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1982

96 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API