Legal Opinion
Kelman v. McDonald
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided April 9, 1991No. 7888PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHeiman, J.
The defendant appeals from the judgment rendered by the trial court quieting and settling the title to certain real property in the plaintiffs. The property in question is located in the Stony Creek section of Branford. Although the defendant alleges four separate issues in this appeal, the questions raised actually constitute but a single issue, that is whether the trial court’s conclusion is supported by the evidence. We conclude that it is, and, consequently, we affirm the trial court’s judgment.
The facts found by the trial court are as follows. The disputed property is a small triangular…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Pandolphe's Auto Parts, Inc. v. Town of ManchesterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Johnson v. FlammiaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
- Kimberly-Clark Corp. v. DubnoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Lukas v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Kelly v. IvlerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Steiger v. J. S. Builders, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1995
- Clement v. ClementConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
- Castonguay v. PlourdeConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
- Top of the Town, LLC v. Somers Sportsmen's Ass'nConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Saradjian v. SaradjianConnecticut Appellate Court · 1991
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.