Legal Opinion
Saradjian v. Saradjian
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided August 6, 1991No. 9704PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHeiman, J.
The defendant1 appeals from the judgment of the trial court declaring that certain real property held in the names of the plaintiff and the late mother of both the plaintiff and the defendant was subject to a resulting trust in favor of the plaintiff to the extent of one half of the late mother’s one-half interest in the property. The plaintiff has cross appealed.
In his appeal, the defendant claims that the trial court improperly (1) imposed a resulting trust in favor of the plaintiff when the only evidence of or permissible inference regarding the decedent’s intent was that the decedent…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Pandolphe's Auto Parts, Inc. v. Town of ManchesterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Breen v. PhelpsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Kimberly-Clark Corp. v. DubnoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Lukas v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Grant v. GrantSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1893
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Collins v. GoldbergConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
- Biggs v. WardenConnecticut Appellate Court · 1991
- Dime Savings Bank v. CornagliaConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
- Woodburn v. Conservation CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
- Schmaling v. SchmalingConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.